<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHEW! Trial Lawyers Won&#039;t Be Destitute After Health Care Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stephenkruiser.com/2009/10/30/whew-trial-lawyers-wont-be-destitute-after-health-care-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stephenkruiser.com/2009/10/30/whew-trial-lawyers-wont-be-destitute-after-health-care-reform/</link>
	<description>Psychoblogging In Boxer-Briefs. Hold Me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:33:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Snooper Report</title>
		<link>http://stephenkruiser.com/2009/10/30/whew-trial-lawyers-wont-be-destitute-after-health-care-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>The Snooper Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenkruiser.com/2009/10/30/whew-trial-lawyers-wont-be-destitute-after-health-care-reform/#comment-562</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PelosiCare: A Curiously Unconstitutional &quot;Bill&quot;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Let&#039;s see what&#039;s in the PelosiCare facade...
Two posts from blogprof, here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PelosiCare: A Curiously Unconstitutional &#8220;Bill&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what&#8217;s in the PelosiCare facade&#8230;<br />
Two posts from blogprof, here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://stephenkruiser.com/2009/10/30/whew-trial-lawyers-wont-be-destitute-after-health-care-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenkruiser.com/2009/10/30/whew-trial-lawyers-wont-be-destitute-after-health-care-reform/#comment-561</guid>
		<description>Although corrupt lawyers are a problem, why aren&#039;t more Constitution-defending patriots pointing out the real problem with Obamacare?

The main problem with Obamacare is actually not the Oval Office and Congress, IMO, but the people.  More specifically, US citizens have evidently not been teaching the Constitution and its history to their children for many generations, particularly the constitutionally enumerated principle of state sovereignty.  Consequently, the people do not understand that since the federal Constitution is silent about programs like Obamacare and the Stimulus Package, the 10th A. automatically reserves government power to regulate and lay taxes for such things to the states, not the Oval Office and Congress.

In fact, Chief Justice Marshall had established the following case precedent, now wrongly ignored, which appropriately limits the power of the feds to lay taxes.

&quot;Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.&quot; --Chief Justice Marshall, GIBBONS V. OGDEN (1824) http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html

So not only is misguided Obama&#039;s proposed healthcare constitutionally unauthorized, but based on Justice Marshall&#039;s official words, the corrupt Congress never had the power to lay taxes to fund such a program in the first place.

What&#039;s going on, IMO, is the following.  State sovereignty-ignorant voters have been electing lawmakers to both the state legislatures and the federal senate who are as state sovereignty-impaired as the voters are. Consequently, these lawmakers have not been doing their jobs to protect state sovereignty by protecting citizens from illegal federal taxes and unconstitutional federal government interference in their lives.

Finally, the following link should help give people an idea how state sovereignty-ignorant voters have shot themselves in the foot with big, corrupt federal government as a consequence of the ill-conceived, anti-state sovereignty 16th and 17th Amendments.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=199792</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although corrupt lawyers are a problem, why aren&#8217;t more Constitution-defending patriots pointing out the real problem with Obamacare?</p>
<p>The main problem with Obamacare is actually not the Oval Office and Congress, IMO, but the people.  More specifically, US citizens have evidently not been teaching the Constitution and its history to their children for many generations, particularly the constitutionally enumerated principle of state sovereignty.  Consequently, the people do not understand that since the federal Constitution is silent about programs like Obamacare and the Stimulus Package, the 10th A. automatically reserves government power to regulate and lay taxes for such things to the states, not the Oval Office and Congress.</p>
<p>In fact, Chief Justice Marshall had established the following case precedent, now wrongly ignored, which appropriately limits the power of the feds to lay taxes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.&#8221; &#8211;Chief Justice Marshall, GIBBONS V. OGDEN (1824) <a href="http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html" rel="nofollow">http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html</a></p>
<p>So not only is misguided Obama&#8217;s proposed healthcare constitutionally unauthorized, but based on Justice Marshall&#8217;s official words, the corrupt Congress never had the power to lay taxes to fund such a program in the first place.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s going on, IMO, is the following.  State sovereignty-ignorant voters have been electing lawmakers to both the state legislatures and the federal senate who are as state sovereignty-impaired as the voters are. Consequently, these lawmakers have not been doing their jobs to protect state sovereignty by protecting citizens from illegal federal taxes and unconstitutional federal government interference in their lives.</p>
<p>Finally, the following link should help give people an idea how state sovereignty-ignorant voters have shot themselves in the foot with big, corrupt federal government as a consequence of the ill-conceived, anti-state sovereignty 16th and 17th Amendments.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=199792" rel="nofollow">http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=199792</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

